Next: Senate Resolution Concerning
Up: No Title
Previous: Senate Resolution Concerning
July 24, 1984
Ms. Melissa Auchard
Chair, ASSU Council of Presidents
Associated Students of Stanford University
Tresidder Memorial Union
Stanford, California 94305
Dear Melissa:
I write to approve the... amendment of the ASSU
Constitution which passed in the general election this spring and which [was]
subsequently presented to me in your letter of June 15, 1984.
My approval of the amendment is with the following understandings:
- The amendment states that in the event of a vacancy in the position of
Financial Manager, the Council of Presidents' could appoint an Acting
Financial Manager to serve until a permanent appointment is made (Article
V, Section 8, B-5). I interpret the limitation of allowing this Acting
Financial Manager to serve for "no more than 14 days" to mean "without
confirmation by the Senate." It may take more than 14 days to advertise
the vacancy, receive application, conduct interviews, and otherwise
conduct a proper search.
- The amendment forbids the Financial Manager from accepting any regular
outside emplcyment outside the Association unless the Senate consents
(Article V, Section 8, B-7). I can only support the intent of this
provision, not the method or the language by which the intent is carried
out. You have every right to take steps to insure that a Financial
Manager performs the job according to fair standards which you set,
including the right to know what other major time commitments a candidate
has which could affect the ability to do this job. But the ASSU should
not restrict what a student does on his or her own time unless there is a
conflict of interest. Accordingly, the amendment embodied by Article V,
Section 8, B-7 is not accepted. I suggest you consider a new amendment
during your next regular election in which you find a way to meet your
purposes without undue intervention in the personal activities of
employees.
- I know that the provision requiring an annual audit was not changed
(Article V, Section 9-D). I simply want to reiterate that the request in
President Pitzer's Letter of Acceptance of March 3, 1970- namely, that
an audit committee should be established- still holds. The Committee
should include a representative of the Controller's Office, but its exact
charge should be defined in a way that makes sense today, given the
existence of a Senate Finance Committee.
- My acceptance of the amendment to Article V, Section 1, is with the
understanding that the total amount of the Association Fee set by the
Senate may be contingent on the success or failure of one or more Special
Fee requests on the ballot in the Spring quarter general election,
provided that both any contingent amounts and the non-contingent or base
amount are approved by the Senate prior to the election, in accordance
with the provisions of this Section.
Sincerely,
Donald Kennedy
President
Next: Senate Resolution Concerning
Up: No Title
Previous: Senate Resolution Concerning